>>Time travelling wasn’t something anyone did without careful planning or the agreement of at least one of the officials in charge of controlling who went where.<<
That should say "when" or "when/where" rather that just "where" because it deals with travel over time not just distance; "when/where" is probably more accurate since time travel also requires an aspect of physical travel (involving a moving planet).
>>I know you’re on holiday, so it’s not as though it’s going to be a problem getting time off<<
Does this type of time travel require that time spent in the past be reflected in returning to the future? Because that's uncommon; usually you can return to the moment you left or shortly thereafter, rendering the holiday issue moot.
>>I’m not going back in time to do anything in particular, just to check a couple of things are going the way they’re meant to be<<
Feedback
Date: 2012-09-26 05:03 am (UTC)That should say "when" or "when/where" rather that just "where" because it deals with travel over time not just distance; "when/where" is probably more accurate since time travel also requires an aspect of physical travel (involving a moving planet).
>>I know you’re on holiday, so it’s not as though it’s going to be a problem getting time off<<
Does this type of time travel require that time spent in the past be reflected in returning to the future? Because that's uncommon; usually you can return to the moment you left or shortly thereafter, rendering the holiday issue moot.
>>I’m not going back in time to do anything in particular, just to check a couple of things are going the way they’re meant to be<<
That should say "check whether" above.